\begin{table}[h!]
	\centering
	\caption{\footnotesize AMCEs for abortion and tax policies varying abstention options.}\label{table:AMCEs}
	\begin{subtable}[t]{.99\textwidth}\centering
		\caption{\footnotesize Pro-life}
		\label{table:AMCEs_PL}
		\begin{adjustbox}{max width=\textwidth}
			\begin{tabular}{@{\makebox[3em][c]{\rownumber\space}} | c|c|c|c|c}
				
				& No Abstention & Uniform Abstention & Pro-life Abstentions & Pro-choice Abstentions \gdef\rownumber{\stepcounter{magicrownumbers}\arabic{magicrownumbers}} \\
				\cmidrule{2-5}
				$\bar{Y}(PL, D ; PL, D)$ - $\bar{Y}(PC, D ; PL, D)$ & 0.50 & -0.50 & 0.50 & -0.50\\
				$\bar{Y}(PL, D ; PL, I)$ - $\bar{Y}(PC, D ; PL, I)$ & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1\\
				$\bar{Y}(PL, D ; PC, D)$ - $\bar{Y}(PC, D ; PC, D)$ & 0.50 & 2 & 2 & 0.50\\
				$\bar{Y}(PL, D ; PC, I)$ - $\bar{Y}(PC, D ; PC, I)$ & 0 & 3 & 3 & 0\\
				$\bar{Y}(PL, I ; PL, D)$ - $\bar{Y}(PC, I ; PL, D)$ & 0 & -2 & 0 & -2\\
				$\bar{Y}(PL, I ; PL, I)$ - $\bar{Y}(PC, I ; PL, I)$ & 0.50 & -0.50 & 0.50 & -0.50\\
				$\bar{Y}(PL, I ; PC, D)$ - $\bar{Y}(PC, I ; PC, D)$ & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1\\
				$\bar{Y}(PL, I : PC, I)$ - $\bar{Y}(PC, I ; PC, I)$ & 0.50 & 2 & 2 & 0.50
				\gdef\rownumber{} \\
				\cdashline{2-5}                                     
				AMCE & $=\frac{4}{40}=0.10$ & $=\frac{6}{40}=0.15$ & $=\frac{10}{40}=0.25$ & $=\frac{0}{40}=0.00$ \\
			\end{tabular}
		\end{adjustbox}
	\end{subtable}
	\vspace*{.25cm}   
	\vspace*{.25cm}   
	\begin{subtable}[t]{.99\textwidth}\centering
		\caption{\footnotesize Cutting taxes}
		\label{table:AMCEs_CT}
		\begin{adjustbox}{max width=\textwidth}
			\begin{tabular}{@{\makebox[3em][c]{\rownumber\space}} | c|c|c|c|c}
				
				& No Abstention & Uniform Abstention & Pro-life Abstentions & Pro-choice Abstentions \gdef\rownumber{\stepcounter{magicrownumbers}\arabic{magicrownumbers}} \\
				\cmidrule{2-5}
				$\bar{Y}(PL, D ; PL, D)$ - $\bar{Y}(PL, I ; PL, D)$ & 0.50 & 1.50 & 0.50 & 1.50\\
				$\bar{Y}(PL, D ; PL, I)$ - $\bar{Y}(PL, I ; PL, I)$ & 0.50 & 1.50 & 0.50 & 1.50\\
				$\bar{Y}(PL, D ; PC, D)$ - $\bar{Y}(PL, I ; PC, D)$ & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
				$\bar{Y}(PL, D ; PC, I)$ - $\bar{Y}(PL, I ; PC, I)$ & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
				$\bar{Y}(PC, D ; PL, D)$ - $\bar{Y}(PC, I ; PL, D)$ & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
				$\bar{Y}(PC, D ; PL, I)$ - $\bar{Y}(PC, I ; PL, I)$ & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
				$\bar{Y}(PC, D ; PC, D)$ - $\bar{Y}(PC, I ; PC, D)$ & 0.50 & -1 & -1 & 0.50\\
				$\bar{Y}(PC, D ; PC, I)$ - $\bar{Y}(PC, I ; PC, I)$ & 0.50 & -1 & -1 & 0.50
				\gdef\rownumber{} \\
				\cdashline{2-5}                                     
				AMCE & $=\frac{2}{40}=0.05$ & $=\frac{1}{40}=0.025$ & $=\frac{-1}{40}=-0.025$ & $=\frac{4}{40}=0.10$\\
			\end{tabular}
		\end{adjustbox}
	\end{subtable}
	
	\caption*{\footnotesize \textit{Notes:} PL=Pro-life, PC=Pro-choice, D=Decrease upper-class taxes, I=Increase upper-class taxes.  %Following \citeauthor{abramsonEtAl2022} (2022), we use Proposition 3 in \citeauthor{hainmuellerHopkinsYamamoto2014} (2014, 16) to calculate the AMCEs.  To do so, we first obtain the difference in the number of votes a candidate with one level of an attribute would receive compared to a candidate with the other level of that same attribute, holding the second attribute constant, when pitted against each possible candidate. We then sum these differences and normalize the sums by the product of the number of possible profiles (4), number of possible profiles with a fixed level of one of the two attributes (2) and the number of voters (5). So, the denominator is calculated as the number of unique profiles times the number of voters times the number of possible profiles with the unique levels of copartisanship and corruption (i.e., $4 \times 5 \times 2$). 
		%See the {\color{blue} Supplementary Materials} for more information. 
	}
	\label{table:AMCEs}
\end{table}